Hypothetical psychology test:

Question #1
Mean score = 1.8
1.
Who came up with the psychosexual
stages
*Sigmund Freud
Skinner
Gardner
Lady Gaga
Question #2
Mean score = 1.4
2.
Which psychologist tested classical
conditioning with dogs
Igor Pavlov
B.F. Skinner
*Ivan Pavlov
Sigmund Freud
Question #3
Mean score = 0.2
3.
Explain the difference between
operant conditioning and classical conditioning, and provide an example of
each.
Question #4
Mean score = 2
4.
The act of removing a stimulus to
reinforce a certain behavior.
*…is called negative reinforcement
Positive reinforcement
Punishment
All of the above
Question #5
Mean score = 0.2
5. Psychology is
_____________
*the study of the psyche
- The mean score for the entire test = 1.12
- A graph that represents the scores for each question.

Evaluation:
This psychology test contains five
questions total. The test itself is very
vague. There are no explanations or
directions. The information provided in
the graph of the test does not tell the reader much information besides the
total number of points that each child earned for each question. I will conduct qualitative item analysis as
well as quantitative item analysis of this psychology test and provide
suggestions as well examples on how this test can be improved.
I
began my analysis by calculating the mean score for each of the questions
listed on the test. The mean or average
of a group of numbers is the measure of central tendency most frequently used (Kubiszyn
& Borich, 2010). One of these characteristics is
stability (Kubiszyn & Borich, 2010) .
Question
number one of the psychology test has twenty possible points. Nine out of ten students answered the
question correctly. This question had a
mean or average score of 1.8 out of a possible two points. This particular question suffers from poor
word choice in the question. The test
question uses the phrase “Who came up with psychosexual stages.” This phrase is very vague. An example of better wording could be “Who
created the stage theory of psychosexual development.” Quantitative item analysis identifies
distractors or response options that are not doing what they are supposed to be
doing (Kubiszyn & Borich, 2010). The response choices for number one include a
response of Lady Gaga. This response is
a distraction and is obviously not the right answer. The other two responses are not clear and can
create confusion.
Seven out of the ten students answered
question two correctly. The mean score
for this question is 1.4. The word
choice in this question is also poor.
The question could be more effective with the use of the word “created”
instead of “tested”. The test creator also uses the exact same answers for
question two as they did in question number one. Multiple choice answers should be challenging
and require thought.
Only one out of ten students
answered question number three correctly.
The mean score for this question is 0.2.
This question is an essay question that requires students to provide a
short answer response. The problem with
this question lies within the test directions or lack thereof. The authors state that it is important to
check your directions for each item format to be sure they are clear (Kubiszyn
& Borich, 2010).
All of the students answered
question number four correctly. The mean
or average score for this question is 2.
This test format changes again with this question. This question is a complete the sentence multiple-choice
question. However, most of the choices
do not provide an option for making a complete understandable sentence. The multiple choice answers are distracting
and do not follow the format of the previous questions.
Question number five has similar
results as question number three. Only
one out of ten students answered this question correctly as well. The mean
score for this question is 0.2. This
question is a fill in the blank format.
It is quite confusing to determine what the objective of this question
is. The test provides one possible
answer below the question. It is unclear
if this answer was provided to the test takers or if it is merely showing the
test scorer what the desired answer was for this question.
This hypothetical test was very
confusing and lacked many essential items.
The test did not have clear concise directions for the test taker. Many of the test response items were either
distracting or not challenging. The
major issue that I saw within this assessment was the lack of consistency. The test utilized four different assessment
methods within five questions. This test
was composed of multiple choice, fill in the blank, short answer, and finish
the sentence. Quantitative and
qualitative item analyses are essential approaches to finding out answers about
test questions. They allow you to find out where the problem
areas are and to make sure test items are valid and reliable measurements of
achievement (Kubiszyn & Borich, 2010). There
are risks to learning and assessment if these types of analysis are not
administered. Test constructors can
expect to make errors in test construction that may include inappropriate,
invalid, or deficient items.
Works Cited
Kubiszyn, T., & Borich, G.
(2010). Educational Testing & Measurement Classroom Application and
Practice. Hoboken:
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
No comments:
Post a Comment